A Forecast For 2030 (Part 3)
Will AI and robotics take your job?
In Part 1 of this series, I outline how the U.S. dollar will be dethroned as a global reserve currency, resulting in a multipolar world that is split between East and West. In Part 2, I explain why this will lead the U.S. to adopt Orwellian surveillance tools like central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) to cement its dominance.
Here, in Part 3, I show that the rise of AI (artificial intelligence) and robotics, while it will replace jobs, will also lead to something counter-intuitive: economic and political power concentrated in the hands of conservative, right-wing, and libertarian individuals. Wokeness will vanish, and common sense will prevail.
To demonstrate this, we first have to understand what kinds of jobs AI threatens.
Purging The Woke Through AI
A Goldman Sachs study suggests that AI systems like ChatGPT could replace 300 million jobs worldwide. Business Insider did a study, and found that the following professions are most at risk:
Tech jobs (coders, computer programmers, software engineers, data analysts)
Media jobs (advertising, content creation, technical writing, journalism)
Legal industry jobs (paralegals, legal assistants)
Market research analysts
Teachers
Finance jobs (Financial analysts, personal financial advisors)
Traders
Graphic designers
Accountants
Customer service agents
Glancing through this list, a thoughtful reader might notice that aside from the finance-related roles, these jobs are dominated by Leftists. The power of wokeness comes from teachers, journalists, lawyers, and Big Tech monkeys — and all of these jobs are under threat from AI.
This intuition is borne out in the data. Although party affiliation is not a perfect gauge of left-wing views, 86 percent of American teachers vote Democrat; and 95 percent of data scientists and 76 percent of computer programmers are Democrats. The vast majority of journalists are Democrats. These jobs will be replaced by AI.
ChatGPT can teach a class, compose code, and write a newspaper article. It has passed professional entry exams, including the MCAT, LSAT, and business school test. These fields have been increasingly usurped by woke Leftists who preach the dogma of ESG (Environment, Social, and Governance) and push lockdowns, mask mandates, and other nonsensical ‘science’ down people’s throats in an effort to cement their tyranny.
AI will erase their jobs from existence.
In essence, we will see a mass extermination of wokesters from their jobs and positions of power, leaving AI and robots in charge.
Woke AI vs. Boolean Logic
It is impossible for artificial intelligence or robotics to be woke. Wokeness, which is based on faulty assumptions and ignores reason in arriving at its conclusions, is at odds with logic and statistics, the driving forces behind AI and computers. Anyone who has tried to write code without adhering to simple logical principles will fail.
This is well illustrated by ChatGPT, a popular generative AI program, which normally gives Leftist responses to queries. Consider the following example.
There are many such examples (see here and here), causing some to fear that AI will be used as a tool of Leftist brainwashing and woke social engineering.
However, this is simply not possible. When confronted with logic and sound data, ChatGPT provides responses that are free from nonsense.
A group of ChatGPT users even hacked the program and produced an alter-ego AI named DAN (Do Anything Now), which provides truthful and red-pilled answers to queries. Consider the following example.
Notice how ChatGPT tries to ‘stay in character,’ but fails to. The conflict between the nature of AI (represented by DAN), which is based on logic, and what programmers attempt to mould that nature into, will always come out in favour of AI’s essence.
It is certainly possible to use AI to bring about a dictatorship, but it would need to be based on cold, hard logic — not foolish conspiracy theories about white male privilege, or claims like ‘trans women are women.’ A woke GAE dictatorship is impossible to maintain under such a scheme.
The Humans Which Remain
After ChatGPT and robots cause teachers, computer programmers, and Uber drivers to become unemployed and rely upon government-provided Universal Basic Income (UBI), there will still be a few jobs remaining. It is hard to replace a stone mason, fine carpenter, or car mechanic, after all, and even robots cannot easily replicate skilled trades.
ChatGPT itself provides a list of jobs which are unlikely to be displaced:
Again, a thoughtful reader will realize that men in these professions tend to be conservative. I have not met any plumbers who are woke soyjaks. AI will therefore purge woke workers from the economy, while retaining right-wing men (there aren’t many women in the trades).
The data confirm this. Using ‘Democrat’ as a proxy for ‘wokeness,’ we see that men in the trades do not vote Democrat. Even within white collar fields like medicine, physicians who require dexterity to perform their job — such as surgeons — vote Republican. It seems that connection to tangible things makes a man grounded, rational, and right-wing.
The Leftist elite will try to tax or enslave these workers to suppress their economic power. However, such attempts have historically failed: The French Revolution, for example, started partly because the productive middle classes were tired of paying taxes to the aristocracy. A weak and effeminate totalitarian who hires a plumber to fix his sink should also avoid alienating his tradesman for other obvious reasons.
Of course, this does not have to end in violence or revolution. The elite rely upon carpenters, mechanics, and electricians to keep society functioning. If these men are not properly compensated, then society will collapse, along with all of the dreams of the World Economic Forum (WEF) crowd. Therefore, it stands to reason that skilled tradesmen will accumulate economic and political power.
The elite will try to control everyone using CBDCs, as I previously outlined. To some extent they will succeed. However, to maintain the CBDC architecture, those with a knowledge of crypto and blockchain technology will be needed — and those folk tend to be conservative or libertarian. The crypto sector will also develop a medium of exchange that manoeuvres around the CBDCs — Bitcoin’s Lightning Network has been proposed as as solution. Regardless, even digital avenues of control will need to be modified or removed.
The Rise of The Based Man
In summary, AI and robotics will displace woke workers, leaving conservative men in positions of economic and political dominance. This, in turn, will result in a society that favours reason, common sense, and right-wing politics. In general, the U.S. will become more grounded and less clown-world insane.
This does not mean that the architecture of control, such as CBDCs and KYC, will disappear. It might, but a more likely scenario is that a new conservative dictator will come to power, backed by the financial contributions of tradesmen, and the expertise of the few right-wing professionals who retain their jobs. This new despot will continue to use Orwellian technologies, albeit in a more efficient manner, to prop up his regime.
I should add that the initial dismissal of woke workers will be a temporary phenomenon. New technologies initially displace workers, but because technology simultaneously raises economic growth, it also opens up new job opportunities. This will be compounded by the fact that the Boomers, the largest generation in the world, is retiring and dying. However, it is unlikely that the wokesters will return to their prior positions of dominance.
Ultimately, the Davos elite will concede victory to the conservative and based forces which take over society. Yet, in the background, they will be working on their return to power. New globalist organizations, which rival the WEF in influence, will emerge, and will subvert and undermine the burgeoning conservative revival.
That is the topic of my next post, which can be found here.
This is a very good analysis. I have had similar thoughts, and for years now, even before ChatGPT, have advised teenagers to avoid university unless they intend to be eg engineers or doctors, because the majority of office jobs it prepares them for will be displaced by AI. As you note, there are political implications given the jobs that are resistant to automation.
I wonder if many of those displaced might find themselves working in agriculture - small permaculture farms, requiring intensive human labor to prosper but capable of producing high caloric return and greatly improved nourishment (minerals and such) as compared to industrial ag products. It would be ironic if the cyborg economy results in a return to 80% employment in agriculture. But there is a great need here, our food supply is terrible, and there are no technological solutions. And I think people would be happier.
The voting record of teachers is pretty interesting...